USA

Five Days Before the Election, a Federal Court Moves Minnesota’s Mail-In Ballot Deadline Up a Full Week

The Slatest
Federal court ruling upends Minnesota’s voting rules. Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

A federal appeals court invalidated Minnesota’s mail-in voting procedure Thursday evening, ruling that mail-in votes had to be received by the close of polls on Election Day, not simply postmarked by then, in order to be counted. The Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, in response to a different lawsuit this summer demanding an extension, agreed in July that mail-in votes would need to be postmarked by November 3, with a seven-day window afterwards for the vote to arrive and be counted. The state subsequently sent out some 1.7 million requested absentee ballots with specific instructions explaining just that. Months later, just five days before the election, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in and changed the rules. Nearly 400,000 of the absentee ballots have yet to be returned, according to Simon.

The federal panel of judges voted 2 to 1 that Minnesota’s accommodation for the predicted surge in mail-in voting due to the pandemic was likely unconstitutional because it usurped the authority of the state legislature to set voting rules. “The Secretary’s instructions to count mail-in ballots received up to seven days after Election Day stand in direct contradiction to Minnesota election law governing presidential elections,” the panel wrote. “There is no pandemic exception to the Constitution.” Under Minnesota law, the deadline to receive ballots is 8 p.m. on Election Day. The two judges in the majority—Judge Bobby Shepherd, an appointee of President George W. Bush, and Trump appointee Steven Grasz—decided that because the suit filed by a Republican activist was likely to succeed, votes postmarked before but received after Election Day should be set aside.

Welcome to the nightmare scenario. The votes received after Election Day as allowed by the state but disallowed by the court would then sit in limbo waiting to be battled over in court after the vote. Republicans have filed numerous lawsuits around the country to limit the scope of voting and counting and the now-Conservative Supreme Court has shown its willingness to agree. So don’t hold your breath for those votes to get included. The Republican-appointed judges said they understood the difficult circumstances around the late-breaking reversal. “With that said, we conclude the challenges that will stem from this ruling are preferable to a postelection scenario where mail-in votes, received after the statutory deadline, are either intermingled with ballots received on time or invalidated without prior warning,” the judges wrote. “Better to put those voters on notice now while they still have at least some time to adjust their plans and cast their votes in an unquestionably lawful way.”

Secretary of State Simon noted, in frustration, that oral arguments in the case were held on Tuesday during a conference call, the very last day the postal service said a ballot could be postmarked and guaranteed to be delivered by Election Day. “I had hoped and reasoned that if the 8th Circuit was going to change a vitally significant deadline, like acceptance of ballots—if they were inclined to do that, I would hope they would have done it an hour after the hearing, even if it was a one-line order,” Simon said ahead of ruling. “It would be tremendously disruptive at this point . . . to issue an order overturning Minnesota’s postmark rule.” But the disruption is the point after all.

Readers like you make our work possible. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you won’t find anywhere else.

Join Slate Plus
Join Slate Plus

Football news:

Shakhtar defender Vitao on 2:0 with Real Madrid: the main Thing is not to fly too high in the clouds
Kiknadze and Meshcheryakov-out! Rabiner after Loko's defeat by Red bull
Real Madrid conceded 9 goals in 5 rounds of the Champions League group stage for The first time
Flick about 1:1 with Atletico: after Muller and Gnabry came on as substitutes, Bayern added to the movement
Muller scored his 47th goal in the Champions League and moved into 10th place ahead of Inzaghi. Zlatan and Shevchenko have 48 goals each
Liverpool and Porto broke into the Champions League play-offs - there are already 8 teams. Which ones? And who is about to be added to them?
Now Liverpool are also without Alisson. The group was won by his 22-year-old substitute with 0 minutes in the Premier League and the Champions League